
In This Issue
SOCIAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL INFLUENCES ON EMERGING ADULT
DRINKING BEHAVIOR
Young adulthood is a time of important transitions. During this
period, people are forming adult identities, building mature relationships,
and preparing for their careers. Increased alcohol use during this time of
emerging adulthood may be attributed to a variety of factors, but drinking
can undermine the ability of some people to make the developmental transitions
typical of this age. Drs. Helene Raskin White and Kristina Jackson examine
the developmental changes and related drinking patterns and problems that
occur during emerging adulthood as well as the sociodemographic and psychosocial
factors that influence drinking in this population. These factors include
gender, race/ethnicity, marital status, college, employment, peer and family
influences, individual temperament, and attitudes toward drinking. The authors
also discuss the need for prevention programs targeted to college students
and to young adults not in college, who may be at particularly high risk for
alcohol-related problems.
ALCOHOL USE AND VIOLENCE AMONG YOUNG ADULTS
Young adults experience more violence than other age groups, with
bars and clubs being the setting of the most severe violence for young men,
and young women tending to encounter the most severe violence in the home.
Drs. Brian M. Quigley and Kenneth E. Leonard report that in both environments,
intoxicated aggression appears to be provoked by personality differences among
people and by characteristics of the triggering situations. Permissive atmospheres
in bars increase the probability of intoxicated aggression, and the more alcohol
consumed, the greater the likelihood of injury. In domestic violence situations,
alcohol use by the husband is predictive of severe violence only in marriages
already high in conflict. Many important questions about the relationship
between alcohol and violence await further study. Does alcohol reduce a person’s
attention to information that would inhibit aggression, as some have hypothesized?
Does alcohol have pharmacological effects on decisionmaking in conflict situations
that could contribute to violent outcomes? How does alcohol affect people
with specific personality traits such as anger and impulsiveness? More information
on these questions is needed so that effective prevention and treatment efforts
can be developed.
TRAJECTORIES OF ALCOHOL USE DURING THE TRANSITION
TO ADULTHOOD
As young people make the transition from their late teens to adulthood,
their drinking practices may follow a variety of tracks, or trajectories.
Some young adults will establish lifelong patterns of alcohol use. Others
may engage in a particular pattern of alcohol use in their late teen or young
adult years that later changes course. Still others may never engage in drinking
or heavy drinking. Generally, people increase the amounts they drink as they
progress through their early twenties, and decrease their drinking when they
take on adult roles. In this article, Drs. Jennifer L. Maggs and John E. Schulenberg
describe both the average (or normative) pattern of alcohol use among young
adults and the various subgroups of people whose drinking patterns follow
different trajectories. They maintain that by identifying common trajectories
of alcohol use during the transition to adulthood, researchers can gain a
better understanding of how alcohol use disorders originate and evolve, how
different trajectories lead to different outcomes, and how to plan prevention,
diagnosis, and intervention.
MATURING OUT OF PROBLEMATIC ALCOHOL USE
After peaking when young people are about 22 years old, heavy drinking
rates among both college students and their nonstudent age-mates decline steadily,
probably in response to the new roles and responsibilities that come with
adulthood. Dr. Patrick M. O’Malley describes key transitions to adulthood
and how they are associated either with increased drinking or with “maturing
out” of alcohol use. The first major change, moving out of the parental
home, often coincides with increasing rates of heavy drinking among many young
people, whether they attend college or not. College students then may be exposed
to campus social environments that sometimes encourage excessive drinking.
As adult responsibilities—such as employment, marriage, and parenthood—mount,
problematic drinking declines, partly because of the limitations these responsibilities
place on social activities in general and because of changes in young adults’
attitudes toward drinking. Young alcohol users who would be diagnosed as alcohol
dependent may be less affected by the more stabilizing, socializing effects
of marriage and parenthood because of personality characteristics that make
them less attracted to these choices, or because their drinking behavior is
less susceptible to such influences.
ALCOHOL AND THE ADOLESCENT BRAIN: HUMAN STUDIES
Adolescents and young adults who drink heavily could place themselves
at risk for alcohol-related impairment of brain development and brain function.
As Dr. Susan F. Tapert, Ms. Lisa Caldwell, and Ms. Christina Burke explain,
heavy alcohol use in young people has been found to affect neuropsychological
functioning, such as memory, attention, planning, and abstract reasoning,
although the observed impairment in most cases was not severe. Young people
with alcohol use disorders may have subtle abnormalities in the structure
of various brain areas, such as the hippocampus, a region that is involved
in learning and memory formation. These abnormalities, in turn, may be associated
with some loss in brain functioning. A person’s risk for impaired brain
development and function is influenced by a number of factors, including genetics
and other influences such as drinking patterns and use of other drugs.
ALCOHOL’S EFFECTS ON THE ADOLESCENT BRAIN:
WHAT CAN BE LEARNED FROM ANIMAL MODELS
Research into the effects of alcohol on the developing human brain
typically has depended on a variety of animal models—including rats,
mice, and other laboratory animals—because both ethical and practical
considerations make it impossible to carry out these investigations in humans.
Analyses of animal models have demonstrated that adolescents may be more susceptible
than adults to some of alcohol’s effects on the brain, especially to
alcohol’s memory-impairing effects. As Drs. Susanne Hiller-Sturmhöfel
and H. Scott Swartzwelder explain, this enhanced susceptibility may be linked
in particular with the hippocampus, an area of the brain that appears to be
especially sensitive to alcohol-induced damage. Alcohol interferes with hippocampal
function to a greater extent in adolescents than in adults. Conversely, adolescents
appear to be less sensitive than adults to some of alcohol’s other effects,
such as alcohol-related impairment of motor coordination, alcohol-induced
sedation, and susceptibility to withdrawal seizures.
GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERPLAY IN ADOLESCENT
DRINKING BEHAVIOR
The relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors
to adolescents’ drinking behavior are illuminated by two longitudinal
studies of Finnish twins reviewed in this article by Drs. Richard J. Rose
and Danielle M. Dick. The authors posit that a person’s drinking behavior
is a manifestation of an unfolding developmental process involving both genetic
and environmental factors, a process that is continuously modulated by gene–environment
correlations and interactions. For example, initiation of drinking is determined
primarily by environmental factors (e.g., familial environment and peers).
Conversely, the establishment of drinking patterns once drinking has been
initiated is increasingly influenced by genetic predisposition, and researchers
are working to identify specific genes involved. Environmental factors such
as place of residence or marital status continue to modify the effects of
these genetic factors.
ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES ON YOUNG ADULT DRINKING
Environmental alcohol control policies may be effective in reducing
alcohol use and related problems among young adults, although the population
of 18- to 25-year-olds is seldom specifically targeted by these policies or
by research evaluating them. According to Drs. Alexander C. Wagenaar and Traci
Toomey and Ms. Kathleen M. Lenk, many studies have shown that establishing
a minimum legal drinking age (MLDA) of 21 is effective in reducing alcohol
consumption and traffic crashes among 18- to 20-year-olds. Underage youth
appear to be especially susceptible to prevention measures that limit alcohol
availability, specifically price increases. And because young adults frequent
retail alcohol establishments more often than members of other age groups,
they also may be disproportionately affected by policies that target these
outlets, such as limiting the number of retail alcohol establishments in a
geographic area, training staff and management in responsible beverage service,
and restricting the marketing of alcoholic beverages through special promotions
and advertising. The authors describe three comprehensive programs that have
used combinations of these measures and list policy recommendations that are
supported by current evidence.
DRINKING AMONG YOUNG ADULTS: SCREENING, BRIEF INTERVENTION,
AND OUTCOME
Twenty-five percent of young adult males and 14 percent of females
have at some time met the diagnostic criteria for alcohol dependence. Although
many young people mature out of problem drinking during early adulthood, excessive
drinking during adolescence and young adulthood can have serious and long-lasting
negative consequences. Because young people do not tend to identify themselves
as having alcohol problems, Drs. Peter M. Monti, Tracy O’Leary Tevyaw,
and Brian Borsari suggest that people in this group may be better identified
using proactive screening in locations where they are likely to seek treatment
related to alcohol problems, such as hospital emergency rooms, college campuses,
or workplaces. Young adults engaging in risky levels of alcohol use may respond
better to brief, intensive interventions, known as brief motivational interventions,
than to traditional, long-term treatments, which originally were designed
for adults with more extensive histories of alcohol use.
INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG
ADULT DRINKING
International comparisons of both adult and adolescent drinking
behaviors analyzed under the auspices of the World Health Organization have
demonstrated great differences in alcohol-related variables—such as
average alcohol consumption, proportion of drinkers, and drinking patterns—among
people in various regions of the world. The European School Survey Project
on Alcohol and Other Drugs (ESPAD) has revealed a wide range of behaviors
among European adolescents and young adults in terms of age at onset of drinking,
prevalence of abstinence, drinking to intoxication, and frequency and amount
of drinking. As Dr. Salme K. Ahlström and Ms. Esa L. Österberg report,
differences in social norms, the context of drinking occasions, and alcohol
pricing policies contribute to the observed variations in drinking patterns.
Particularly for the age group of young adults, however, substantial gaps
remain in the understanding of drinking behavior.
COMMUNITY PREVENTION OF YOUNG ADULT DRINKING AND
ASSOCIATED PROBLEMS
Whether they are working, attending college, or in the military,
young adults are typically part of a community. In this article, Dr. Harold
D. Holder examines three research-based community prevention programs that
use a combination of environmental strategies to reduce heavy drinking and
related problems. Trials of programs provide strong evidence that comprehensive
strategies can effect substantial changes in alcohol-related behavior. Research
indicates that local policies to reduce young adult drinking or alcohol-related
problems are most likely to be effective when they are adequately enforced
and when the intended targets of the intervention are aware of both the policies
and their enforcement. By restructuring the total alcohol environment in a
way that can be self-sustaining, these approaches are likely to be more effective
than one-time interventions.
PREVENTING ALCOHOL-RELATED PROBLEMS ON COLLEGE CAMPUSES
News headlines of alcohol-related injuries and deaths among college
students highlight the need for effective prevention measures on college campuses.
The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Task Force on College
Drinking addressed this problem. The Task Force reviewed existing interventions,
most of which target individual drinkers rather than the college population
as a whole, and issued recommendations on which interventions might be effective
in a college setting. Dr. Robert Saltz summarizes these recommendations, which
classify potential interventions into four tiers. Of these, only Tier 1 strategies
(e.g., cognitive-behavioral skills training, motivational enhancement interventions,
or interventions to challenge alcohol expectancies) have been demonstrated
effective among college students. Tier 2 strategies, which include enforcement
of laws to prevent alcohol-impaired driving, restrictions on alcohol retail
outlet density, and responsible beverage service policies, have been successful
with other populations and show promise for the college environment.
ALCOHOL USE AND PREVENTING ALCOHOL-RELATED PROBLEMS
AMONG YOUNG ADULTS IN THE MILITARY
Heavy alcohol use remains a persistent problem in the U.S. military
and is especially prevalent among young adult (18- to 25-year-old) service
members. According to Drs. Genevieve Ames and Carol Cunradi, certain characteristics
of the military culture may contribute to heavy drinking in this population.
The authors compare the rates of alcohol use among young adults in all four
branches of the military with rates for young adult civilians, including college
students. In addition to describing the relevant risk factors, such as a workplace
culture in which alcohol is accepted as a way to deal with stress, boredom,
and loneliness, the article also examines strategies that may help mitigate
risk and reduce heavy drinking in this group. Research is needed to evaluate
these strategies, which included alcohol use policies, making alcohol use
less glamorous, and promoting overall good health.
ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION AMONG YOUNG ADULTS AGES 18–24
IN THE UNITED STATES: RESULTS FROM THE 2001–2002 NESARC SURVEY
The high prevalence of drinking in young adults is a serious public
health concern. Alcohol use among young adults often is associated with a
wide variety of risky behaviors and negative consequences, many of which are
immediate and tragic. The 2001–2002 National Epidemiologic Survey on
Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC) presents a unique opportunity to examine
young adult drinking for three reasons—the excellent response rate,
the oversampling of young adults ages 18–24, and the inclusion of college-related
group housing. Mr. Chiung M. Chen and Drs. Mary C. Dufour and Hsiao-ye Yi
provide a broad overview of the nature of young adult drinking in the United
States using data from the NESARC survey. According to these data, in 2001–2002,
over three-quarters of young adults ages 21–24 were current drinkers,
as were nearly two-thirds of those ages 18–20, despite the fact that
the legal drinking age is 21. More than half of young adult men exceeded the
recommended daily drinking limit, as did two-fifths of the young adult women.
Drinking that exceeds this daily limit is likely to impair both mental and
physical performance. Over the past decade there has been an increase in the
number of young people drinking 5 or more drinks on at least 12 occasions
during the past year—which helps to explain the increased risk of injury
and other acute negative consequences so common today among college students
ages 18–24.